The Math Doesn't Work Because the Variables Are Wrong, Not Because You're Bad at Math
The Math Doesn't Work Because the Variables Are Wrong, Not Because You're Bad at Math
You've tried. You've shown up. You've done the thing where you explain yourself, adjust, accommodate, translate your natural way of being into something more palatable. You've read the articles. You've probably even apologized for things that weren't wrong just to keep the peace.
And it still doesn't work.
So you start to wonder if you're the problem. If you're just bad at relationships. Bad at people. Bad at the math of human connection.
You're not.
The math doesn't work because the variables are wrong.
Here's what happens: You say what you mean. Directly. Clearly. No hidden layers, no subtext, no riddles. Just words, arranged in a sentence, meaning exactly what they say.
Revolutionary concept, apparently.
But the other person hears coldness. They hear dismissal. They read tone into brevity that was never there. You said "no" and somehow they received a 47-page dissertation on how much you hate them.
You weren't being short. You were being clear. But now you're in a conversation about your delivery instead of the actual thing that mattered. The original topic is gone. We're doing a post-mortem on your tone now.
This is the tax. The constant conversion fee of translating yourself into a language that neurotypical communication expects.
And it's exhausting. Not because you can't do it—you've been doing it your whole life—but because you have to do it constantly, and it still gets misread. You could wrap your words in a compliment sandwich, add three softeners, a "just" and a "maybe," and someone would still find a way to be hurt by it.
At that point you start to wonder if the problem is actually just... being perceived at all.
The standard advice is to add cushioning. Soften your delivery. Manage other people's interpretations preemptively. Basically, become a full-time emotional insurance adjuster for every sentence that leaves your mouth.
And sure, that works sometimes. But it also means you're always performing. Always calculating. Always adding padding around a message that didn't need padding in the first place.
Meanwhile—and here's the fun part—the people who tell you to soften your delivery will hit you with something actually dismissive and somehow that's not cold. That's just them having feelings. That's just their communication style. That's just how they are when they're stressed.
The standards aren't applied evenly. They never are. Welcome to the game where you don't know the rules and they change depending on who's losing.
So the math doesn't work. And you assume it's you.
But look at the equation again.
You're trying to solve for connection using variables like:
- Constant emotional translation
- One-sided accommodation
- Relationships that drain more than they give
- People who need you to manage their reactions to your boundaries
- Communication styles that treat clarity as violence
Those variables don't sum to anything sustainable. You could be a genius and still not solve this equation because the inputs are garbage.
It's not your fault the answer keeps coming up negative.
The fix isn't trying harder with the same inputs. That's just running the same broken calculation faster and wondering why you keep getting the same wrong answer.
The fix is changing the variables.
Find people who speak direct. Who don't need you to cushion every sentence. Who hear what you say and take it at face value instead of launching a full forensic investigation into what you really meant.
Find people who give energy back instead of just consuming yours like you're a free charging station.
Find people who are more interested in fixing the problem than assigning blame for it.
They exist. They're just not the majority. And that's fine. You don't need the majority. You need like, four people max. Maybe a cat.
You're not bad at relationships. You're running an operating system that most people don't have the drivers for.
That's not a flaw in your code. That's a compatibility issue.
Stop trying to make incompatible systems work. Stop forcing your software to run on hardware that keeps throwing errors. Start looking for the ones that run native.
The math will work when you change the variables.
And if it still doesn't, at least you'll be less tired.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!